What is the typical outcome for a license granted to use property?

What is the typical outcome for a license granted to use property?

• A. It is transferable to future owners
• B. It cannot be revoked without cause
• C. It is non-permanent
• D. It guarantees exclusive use

Answer: (C)

The correct outcome for a license granted to use property is that it is non-permanent. A license grants permission to use property but does not confer any ownership rights or an interest in the property itself. This means a license is typically revocable and can be terminated at any time by the property owner. Because it is a personal right to use the property, it does not last indefinitely. In the context of property rights, this non-permanence distinguishes licenses from easements, which are typically more durable and can often continue to exist even after the original parties are no longer involved. The nature of a license is that it is contingent upon the terms set by the property owner, and as such, once granted, it does not provide a lasting claim to the property or its uses.

The correct outcome for a license granted to use property is that it is non-permanent. A license grants permission to use property but does not confer any ownership rights or an interest in the property itself. This means a license is typically revocable and can be terminated at any time by the property owner. Because it is a personal right to use the property, it does not last indefinitely.

In the context of property rights, this non-permanence distinguishes licenses from easements, which are typically more durable and can often continue to exist even after the original parties are no longer involved. The nature of a license is that it is contingent upon the terms set by the property owner, and as such, once granted, it does not provide a lasting claim to the property or its uses.